In this article in the New York Times it talks about the possibilities of Holder becoming the Attorney General and many of his qualifications as well as the problems that he has faced in his life. One of the main problems was his decision not to hold a man Marc Rich guilty for tax evasion and illegally making deals with Iran during a hostage crisis. Instead of sentencing this man he was gave the go ahead and president clinton pardoned him. In many spots in the article it talks about how Holder would be a good choice, however in the second paragraph there is a line that says.
“If he is confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Holder will be the first African American attorney general.”
Why? I understand that this point in history will always be remembered regarding President Elect Obama however I don’t see the point in pointing out that he will be the first African American to hold that position. Are we so caught up in that we as a country arent racist we have to point out everytime that we have a minority hold a high position? The man is well qualified, he has man supporters on both sides of the senate Republican and Democratic. I just don’t see how his decisions will change based on his ethnicity. He is and will be a well qualified possibility for the position whether or not he gets chosen for it. Why do you need to point out that he is black it shouldn’t matter qualified or not. Race is not a basis for intelligence and skills in political ability.
What do you think?